The more benighted amongst us may not have discerned the true purpose of this charade, but I most certainly did. In truth it was for the purpose of promoting the opposite; tolerance of sodomy. It's frankly run of the mill leftist subversion stratagem. They manipulate the right into allowing them admission, and therefore credibility, based upon the pretext of engaging in a substantive dialogue "on the issues," and then once admitted begin pushing acceptance of (insert leftist goal here). And from the absolute outset, the standard manipulation is employed, via Guy Benson's idiotically praising CPAC for allowing sodomy a forum amongst Conservatives to be openly discussed, as opposed to being peremptorily denied any such affirmation, as it was traditionally in this and all Christian societies.
The purpose of Benson's remarks is plain. It's the paradigmatic dispensation of emotional treats to the target audience prior to the commencement of brainwashing; saying it takes "courage," "leadership," and "vision" to broach the topic. Basically, what he's saying is you're such good and enlightened people, for allowing us to come here and brainwash you; the dulcet platitudinal lube so often applied by leftists before the specious intellectual rape begins. But talking about anal sex, particularly in this setting, is not an expression of any of those attributes; any more than talking about pedophilia in a neutral way requires "courage," "leadership," and "vision;" any more than Bruce Jenner cutting off penis required "courage," "leadership," and "vision." Etc.
It takes abject indecency and dearth of Christian conscience to broach such a topic in such a fashion. Nothing else.
This spectacle has absolutely nothing to do with reaching any sort of copacetic solution to the issue of sodomite marriage, but rather is directly derived from Socialist sodomite subversion strategy, articulated in great detail almost thirty years ago by two sodomite activists.
"The first order of business is desensitization of the American public concerning gays and gay rights. To desensitize the public is to help it view homosexuality with indifference instead of with keen emotion. [...] The principle behind this advice is simple: almost any behavior begins to look normal if you are exposed to enough of it at close quarters and among your acquaintances. The acceptability of the new behavior will ultimately hinge on the number of one's fellows doing it or accepting it. [...] The way to benumb raw sensitivities about homosexuality is to have a lot of people talk a great deal about the subject in a neutral or supportive way. Open and frank talk makes the subject seem less furtive, alien, and sinful, more above-board. Constant talk builds the impression that public opinion is at least divided on the subject, and that a sizable segment accepts or even practices homosexuality." - The Overhauling of Straight America.I could sit here and disingenuously ask, are those who run CPAC so obtuse as to be blind to this transparent artifice? But the answer to that is quite obvious. Yes, or worse, they are complicit.
The purpose of speaking about "gay marriage" in a "neutral or supportive way" at CPAC, is a clear sign that this agenda is now being advanced through even the most stalwart bastions of what's considered "Conservatism," revealing their actual "Conservative" credentials diminished in proportion. The raising of hands to anything other than opposition to sodomite marriage, is a testament to how successful it's been, and this dialogue can only serve to augment that success by virtue of its tolerant disposition.
It must be understood that the only thing CPAC has accomplished with this farce, is not to reach any amicable reconciliation between sodomites and Conservatives, but to speciously advance the agenda of the former. The mere fact that they had this conversation at all, serves that agenda, by validating sodomy. Just as it would for child rape, if CPAC allowed members of NAMBLA to take the stage, and talk about pederasty in a "neutral or supportive way," under the absurd pretext of reconciling the two groups, or even more absurdly, advancing the interests of Conservatives. (The laughably fallacious premise of this dialogue.)
Even the title of the article to which I'm alluding serves this agenda. There is no such thing as a "Conservative gay marriage advocate." That claim is tantamount to calling someone a "free market Communist." One precludes the other. And in regard to Conservatism, which is irrevocably rooted in the Judeo-Christian ethos, one necessarily precludes the other also. Once one rejects "the laws of nature and nature's God," rooted in Biblical morality, he necessarily likewise rejects a political philosophy predicated upon such.
The support of sodomy has never been, and is not now, a "Conservative" position. It's an indubitably Socialist position.
"The Socialist Party recognizes the human and civil rights of all, without regard to sexual orientation. We call for the end of all anti-gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender (GLBTQ) restrictions in law and the work place, the repeal of all sodomy laws, and the legalization of same-sex marriage." - Socialist Party USA, platform 2015-2017.And this merely serves to illustrate something I've been saying for many years, to which the vast preponderance, even the supposed intellectual "leadership" of the right, are oblivious. The sodomite movement has been one of, if not the most conspicuous and consistent transgressors in the war against American freedom. It has been, time and again, at the forefront, if not the spearhead, of the totalitarian agenda seeking to supplant local and state sovereignty with an all powerful, centralized, national Socialist government. A prime example of this, but one of many, is the recent Supreme Court ruling imposing sodomite marriage upon numerous states, thereby nullifying legislation which had proscribed it legitimately through referendum in those sates, and taking one more giant step toward abolishing the Tenth Amendment, and utterly supplanting the "limited" federal government established by the Founders, with an all powerful centralized Communist state.
The sodomite movement is, as it always has been throughout history (e.g., the rule of Nero), one of the most tyrannical in existence. It spends every moment of every day, empowering the government beyond its Constitutional trammels, for its own personal benefit. And no one who supports it is, or can be, a "Conservative." They are, as I have long stated, neo-pagan Socialists. That's what they will be called by me.
These "gay marriage advocates" are feigning mutual interest purely as a vehicle for pushing sodomy within CPAC, and the idiots who run CPAC swallowed it hook, line, and sinker, and simply granted them a carte blanche opportunity to do so. The fact is supporters of sodomy have no business being there at all. Democrat economic policy isn't what crushed Christian businesses. Tolerance of sodomy did. Their ostensible pro-business stance, is merely a pretense they're using to advance that tolerance even further. Under the pretense of being pro-business, and therefore "right-leaning," they will advance the most radical of leftist causes throughout the ranks of Conservatism, in the same manner they have virtually every other institution that's been subverted.
CPAC should be denounced, its leadership terminated, and if it cannot correct itself, disbanded altogether for this egregious violation of Conservative precept and etiquette. We already have enough subverted institutions pushing this vile iniquity at every opportunity. We don't need another one, least of all one of our own, becoming duplicative of the opposition's beliefs and operations.
(Originally posted by me on Sorba's blog: March, 2016.)
No comments:
Post a Comment